After a decade of ambiguity, the SEC and CFTC just told the market exactly what crypto is — and what it isn't.
In a joint interpretation issued March 17, the two agencies established a five-category token taxonomy, declared that "most crypto assets are not securities," and named 16 digital commodities by name. SEC Chair Atkins unveiled "Reg Crypto," a safe harbor giving token issuers up to four years of regulatory breathing room. The Senate passed a CBDC ban 89-10. Federal regulators gave tokenized securities equal capital treatment. And the CLARITY Act is either about to break through — or die.
Six stories. The clearest regulatory picture the industry has ever had.
The SEC and CFTC Just Classified Crypto
On March 17, the SEC and CFTC issued a joint interpretation that does what Congress has been trying to do for three years: define which crypto assets are securities, which are commodities, and which are neither. The result is a five-category token taxonomy — digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, payment stablecoins (under the GENIUS Act), and digital securities (tokenized traditional assets). Only the last category falls under the securities laws.
Sixteen crypto assets were explicitly named as digital commodities, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, Cardano, Chainlink, Avalanche, Polkadot, Stellar, Litecoin, and others. These fall under CFTC spot market jurisdiction. The practical effect: banks, exchanges, and asset managers now have a defined classification framework for compliance, custody, and product development.
SEC Chair Paul Atkins called it the end of "more than a decade of uncertainty" and announced plans for "Reg Crypto," a safe harbor that would give token issuers a startup exemption of up to four years from full registration requirements. The CFTC issued a companion statement confirming it will administer the Commodity Exchange Act consistent with the interpretation.
Why it matters for banks: This is the classification framework the industry has been waiting for. Banks evaluating custody, trading, or lending products tied to digital assets now have a federal taxonomy to build compliance programs around. The 16 named digital commodities represent assets that banks can hold, custody, or facilitate transactions in without triggering securities registration obligations. The "technology-neutral" framing means blockchain-native assets and tokenized traditional assets both have clear regulatory homes.
Sources: SEC Press Release | SEC Chair Atkins Speech | CoinDesk
The Turf War Is Over: SEC and CFTC Sign Historic MOU
Six days before the token taxonomy dropped, the SEC and CFTC signed a Memorandum of Understanding on March 11 that replaces their 2018 agreement and creates a Joint Harmonization Initiative for coordinated crypto oversight. The MOU covers product definitions, clearing and margin frameworks, dual-registered exchanges, and enforcement coordination.
The significance is structural. For years, the biggest complaint from the crypto industry — and from banks trying to evaluate digital asset products — was that the SEC and CFTC couldn't agree on jurisdiction. The result was paralysis: compliance departments couldn't build programs because the rules changed depending on which agency was looking. That era is over.
Why it matters for banks: Unified SEC-CFTC oversight means a single compliance framework for digital asset products. Banks no longer need to hedge against conflicting agency interpretations. The MOU specifically addresses dual-registered exchanges and joint clearing standards — infrastructure that banks will interact with as they integrate digital asset services.
Sources: Cadwalader | PYMNTS
The Senate Just Banned CBDCs (89-10)
On March 12, the U.S. Senate voted 89-10 to pass the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, which includes a provision banning the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency until 2030. The bill was previously passed by the House but substantially amended by the Senate.
The CBDC ban drew broad bipartisan support, though Senator Elizabeth Warren blocked efforts to make it permanent, negotiating the 2030 sunset. The bill's future is uncertain — the House must now vote on the Senate's amended version, and President Trump has signaled he won't sign legislation without a voter-ID provision.
Why it matters for banks: A retail CBDC would have disintermediated banks from the payments stack entirely. With a ban in place through at least 2030, the path for bank-issued stablecoins, tokenized deposits, and private-sector payment innovation is wide open. Banks are the mechanism through which dollar-denominated digital payments will flow — not the Fed.
Tokenized Securities Get Equal Capital Treatment
On March 5, the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC jointly issued interagency guidance confirming that tokenized securities receive identical regulatory capital treatment to their non-tokenized counterparts. The agencies stated that their capital rules are "fundamentally technology neutral" — the blockchain used to issue or record an asset does not change its risk weight.
The guidance applies regardless of whether the asset sits on a permissioned or permissionless chain. A tokenized Treasury gets the same treatment as a book-entry Treasury. An eligible tokenized security that meets the definition of "financial collateral" qualifies as a credit risk mitigant under the capital rule. Banks are expected to conduct due diligence on legal enforceability of ownership rights and evaluate operational risks of the DLT platforms involved.
Why it matters for banks: This removes the last major capital-treatment ambiguity for tokenized assets. Combined with the OCC's interpretive letters on custody (IL 1170) and riskless principal transactions (IL 1188), the regulatory path for banks to hold and transact in blockchain-based securities is now fully defined. The question has shifted from "can we?" to "how fast?"
The CLARITY Act: Stablecoin Yield or Bust
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act — the most comprehensive crypto market structure bill to pass the House (294-134) — is stuck in the Senate over a single provision: whether stablecoin issuers can offer yield on dollar-denominated tokens.
On March 5, the American Bankers Association, backed by 52 state banking associations, formally rejected the White House's compromise. The ABA warned that $6.6 trillion in bank deposits could be at risk. Standard Chartered estimated yield-bearing stablecoins could redirect up to $1 trillion in deposits by 2028. A bipartisan group of senators introduced a new compromise on March 10 that would permit limited activity-based rewards while banning idle-balance yield, but the ABA has signaled it's not enough.
Galaxy Digital analyst Alex Thorn warned on March 14 that the bill effectively dies if it doesn't clear the Senate Banking Committee by end of April. The legislative window is closing.
Why it matters for banks: Community banks fund 60% of small-business loans and 80% of agricultural lending from deposits. If stablecoin yields pull even a fraction of those deposits, lending capacity shrinks. Banks that can offer competitive digital asset services — custody, lending, payments — are positioning to retain customers. Banks waiting on the sideline are betting Washington will protect them. That bet is looking worse by the week.
Eleven Charters in Eighty-Three Days
The OCC charter wave continues. Since December, eleven companies have filed for or received conditional national trust bank charters in 83 days. The latest: Zerohash filed on March 4, becoming the eleventh applicant. Morgan Stanley filed in February for a subsidiary called Morgan Stanley Digital Trust National Association. Payoneer followed. The Conference of State Banking Supervisors pushed back, calling the resulting structure a "Franken-charter," but the momentum is unmistakable.
Why it matters for banks: When Morgan Stanley files for a crypto trust charter, it's not a crypto story. It's a wealth management story. They're building a vertically integrated digital asset stack: ETFs for market access, ETRADE for retail, and a trust bank for custody and staking. Community banks that view crypto custody as someone else's business are watching their most sophisticated competitors build the infrastructure to take it in-house.
Sources: FinTech Weekly | Banking Dive
What to Watch
The CLARITY Act deadline. Galaxy Digital says the bill dies if it doesn't clear the Senate Banking Committee by end of April. The stablecoin yield compromise is the key sticking point.
Reg Crypto details. SEC Chair Atkins announced the safe harbor framework but hasn't published draft text yet. The scope of the startup exemption — up to four years — will determine how aggressively token issuers move forward.
GENIUS Act comment period. The OCC's 376-page proposed rule is still open for comment. This is the framework that will govern bank stablecoin activities. The deadline to shape it is closing.
Track every regulatory development in real time. Our Regulatory Radar monitors OCC interpretive letters, FDIC guidance, Fed actions, and state-level developments as they happen. View the Regulatory Radar at galoy.io/research/regulatory
—
Looking to integrate bitcoin products into your financial institution? Learn how at galoy.io.